In 1897 Fridtjof Nansen published Farthest North, his narrative about the three years he spent in the Arctic, part of it on the famous ship, the Fram, and part of it attempting to sledge to the North Pole with one companion from the ship and being turned back by the ice to face a harrowing fifteen months before being rescued on Franz Josef Land. I read this book quite recently and still am thinking about the amazing fact that he, all his companions on the ship, and the Fram itself survived three years of polar weather and challenges. They didn’t reach the pole but they did get within a few degrees. Some of the most entrancing sections of the book are the descriptions of the cozy interior of the ship; locked into the ice and drifting west in the direction of Svalbard, the expedition team read books, ate nice meals with desserts, and played cards, while the wind howled and the snow fell outside.
Nansen studied to become a marine biologist before he became a polar hero and later a statesman with a side line in oceanography. In the introduction to Farthest North he lays out a short history of attempts to reach the North Pole by ship, and the many disasters. He explains his own theory of ocean currents that run west from Siberia to Greenland and how they could help, not hinder a ship in an expedition to the Pole.
In memorable and prescient words, he writes, “I believe that if we pay attention to the actually existent forces of nature, and seek to work with and not against them, we shall thus find the safest and easiest method of reaching the Pole.”
![]() |
Sohvi Kangasluoma with her dog on the ice |
The other day I had cause to remember those words, when I read an article in the High North News (April 30, 2025) about Dr. Sohvi Kangasluoma, a young woman scientist from Finland who’s taken some of Nansen’s ideas further. Kangasluoma, a post-doc at the Arctic Centre at the University of Lapland, lives and works with her partner Juho Karhu in their sailboat. Last summer the couple transited the Northwest Passage from Alaska to Greenland to study the movement of ice. In the winter of 2024-2025 they embedded the boat in pack ice off the east coast of Greenland.
Kangasluoma’s dissertation is titled Understanding Arctic oil and gas: Entanglements of gender, emotions and environment (and can be downloaded here). In the High North article she discusses the ways that the Arctic is currently viewed as a geopolitical prize to be fought over, Kangasluoma has pointed out that sea ice “is approached as something that just is and melts. But it is anything but a passive and dead thing; it is very much alive, and it has agency of its own."
Like other researchers influenced by feminist and ecological views of nature, Sohvi Kangasluoma, looked beyond the sea as only a place to extract wealth, whether in the form of fish, minerals, or oil and natural gas, an enormous site of geopolitical greed and political conflict. She researched the Arctic seas with an eye to the non-human. "We tend to have this very anthropocentric way of thinking. Humans need a shift in knowledge. Humans are not alone here; there are so many other actors as well. This is, of course, already present in many Indigenous ontologies and ways of life, which we need to start listening to."
The article has a link to a video called “Turning Our Boat
into an Igloo.” The YouTube
channel, Alluring Arctic Sailing, has other videos equally fascinating. It's maintained by Juho Karhu,
who has a scientific background as well and contributes to voluntary research
projects. His voice and manner are incredibly calm, no matter what
seems to be happening on the ice or how hard the wind is blowing.